The traffic study does not show a problem that permanent infrastructure or bike lanes would solve, and it does show conditions where those changes could make traffic worse.
The data shows traffic spikes lasting roughly 15 minutes, rather than sustained congestion throughout the day. For the remainder of the day, the surrounding streets function normally.
It does not make sense to permanently redesign streets to address a condition that occurs only a few minutes per day, and only on weekdays when school is in session.
Peak periods already involve heavy turning movements, limited visibility, and driver stress. Introducing fixed elements such as curbs, barriers, or lane changes increases complexity during the most difficult traffic conditions.
Short and predictable peak periods call for management and monitoring, not permanent changes like concrete barriers, curb installations, removal of trees, or loss of on-street parking.
The traffic study does not demonstrate a deficiency that dedicated bike lanes would solve.
Once installed, major infrastructure changes are very difficult to undo. The City should avoid irreversible modifications unless there is a clear, data-supported need.
Installing bike lanes permanently removes roadway space all day, even though the congestion issue occurs only briefly.
The study does not show collision data, injury trends, or documented safety conflicts that would justify major infrastructure changes.
The intersection experiences short peaks and then returns to normal operation without intervention. There is no evidence of persistent failure.
Traffic arrives in bursts rather than a steady flow. Removing lanes or flexibility during those bursts increases the risk of congestion and operational problems.